1.英文是什么意思?

2.DOS是啥意思?怎么用的?

3.海尔格言:日事日毕,日清日高。是什么意思

4.篮球场上各个位置的英文缩写是什么?

ASTMAmerican Society for Testing and MaterialsASTM?; ;

clears是什么意思_cleartype是什么意思的缩写

ASTM-B-633ZINC PLATE

SC2ASTM-B-633?2?

RoHS?(Restriction of Hazardous Substances)2006?7?1(:PBDE)?60.1%

TYPE III WITH CLEAR RoHS COMPLIANT TRIVALENT CHROMATE CONVERSION?RoHS?

英文是什么意思?

pc personal computer 个人计算机。

ibm international business machine 美国国际商用机器公司的公司简称,

是最早推出的个人计算机品牌。

intel 美国英特尔公司,以生产cpu芯片著称。

pentium intel公司生产的586 cpu芯片,中文译名为“奔腾”。

it information technology 信息产业。

e-commerce electronic business 电子商务。

b2c business to customer 商家对顾客, 电子商务的一种模式,还有b2c、c2c模式。

y2k 2k year两千年(问题),千年虫。

ic integrate circuit 集成电路,vlsi very large scale integration 超大规模集成电路。

diy do it yourself 自己装配计算机。

bit 比特,一个二进制位,通信常用的单位。

byte 字节,由八个二进制位组成,是计算机中表示存储空间的最基本容量单位。

k 千,存储空间的容量单位, kilobyte,1k=字节。

m 兆,megabyte,1m=k。

g 吉,gigabyte,1g=m。

t 太,1t=g。

binary 二进制,计算机中用的记数制,有0、1两个数字。

ascii american standard code for information interchange, 美国信息交换标准代码,成为了一个为世界计算机使用的通用标准。

cai computer-assisted instruction 计算机教学。

cad computer-aided design 计算机设计。

cam computer-aided manufacturing计算机制造。

ai artificial intelligence 人工智能。

program 程序,由控制计算机运行的指令组成。

driver 驱动程序或驱动器。

compatibility 兼容,指电脑的通用性。

pnp plug and play 即插既用,指计算机器件一装上就可以用。

hardware 硬件,构成计算机的器件。

software 软件,计算机上运行的程序。

courseware 课件,用于教学的软件。

硬件篇

cpu central processing unit,中央处理器,计算机的心脏。

memory 存储器,内存。

rom read only memory,只读存储器。只能读不能写。

ram random access memory, 随机存取存储器。内存属于这种存储器。

bus 总线,计算机中信息的通路。

isa industry standard architecture工业标准结构(总线)。

vesa video electronic standard association电子标准协会(的标准总线)。

pci perpheral component interconnect 外部互联总线标准。

usb universal serial bus , intel 公司开发的通用串行总线架构。

scsi small computer system interface小型计算机系统接口。

agp accelerate graphics processor加速图形接口。

mouse 鼠标,俗称“鼠”。

keyboard 键盘。

crt cathode ray tube 阴极射线管,常指显示屏。

lcd liquid crystal display 液晶显示屏。

vga video graphics array图形阵列,一种显示卡。

resolution 分辨率。

printer 打印机。

scanner 扫描仪。

floppy disk 软盘。

fixed disk, hard disk 硬盘。

cd compact disk 光盘。

adapter 适配器(卡),俗称“卡”,如声卡、显示卡。

ups uninterruptible power system不间断电源。

lpt line printer打印口,并行口。

dpi dots per inch 每英寸点数, 指打印机的分辨率。

cps characters per second 每秒字符数。

ppm pages per minute 每分钟(打印)页数。

软件篇

os operating system, 计算机操作系统,计算机中必不可少的软件。

dos disk operating system 磁盘操作系统。

windows nt 一种操作系统,nt new technology, 新技术。

linux 一种可免费使用的unix操作系统, 运行于一般的pc机上 ,由linux开发而得此名。

basic beginner’s all-purpose symbolic instruction code, 初学者通用符号指令代码,一种计算机语言,适合于初学者。不要把basic当作basic。

visual basic 可视化basic语言。

database 数据库。

esc escape, 退出键。

tab table, 制表键。

shift 上档键,用于输入双字符键上面部分的字符和在大(小)写字符状态输入小(大)写字符。

ctrl control 控制键。

alt alter, 转换键。

insert、delete 插入、删除。

home 、end 编辑文书时用于回到文书开头、结尾的键。

page up、page down 向前、后翻页键。

num lock 数字锁定键。

scroll lock 屏幕滚动锁定键。

enter 确认键、也有回车换行的作用。

click 点击鼠标。

cut 剪切,指将文本或图形剪切到内存。

copy 复制、拷贝。

paste 粘贴,将剪切、复制到内存的内容粘贴出来。

debug 程序排错。bug意为小虫子,比喻隐藏在程序中的小错误。

virus 计算机,计算机中自我复制传播的程序。

backup 备份。

网络多媒体篇

multimedia 多媒体,指计算机能综合处理声音、图象、影像、动画、文字等多种媒体。

cd compact disk 光盘,分为只读光盘和可刻录光盘。

cdr compact disk recordable 可刻录光盘。

vcd video cd cd

audio 音频

video

mpeg moving picture expert group运动图象专家组, 一种压缩比率较大的活动图象和声音的压缩标准。

bmp bitmap 位图,一种图象格式。

image 图象。

pixel 像素,图象的一个点。

w we 声波,一种声音格式

midi musical instrument digital interface 乐器数字接口,声卡上有这种接口,用于与乐器相连。

modem 调制解调器,也称“猫”,用于把电话音频信号变成数字信号。

net, network 网络。

wan wide area network 广域网,指地理上跨越较大范围的跨地区网。

lan local area network 局域网,地理上局限在小范围,属于一个单位组建的网。

internet 互联网、因特网、网际网。

server 服务器,网络的核心,信息的集中地。

client 客户,指使用计算机的用户。

c/s client/server 客户机/服务器

b/s browser/server 浏览器/服务器,指客户通过浏览器访问服务器的信息。

workstation 工作站,连到服务器的单个计算机。

world wide web万维网,全球范围的节点。

bbs bulletin board system 电子布告栏系统

ftp file transfer protocol 文件传送协议,用此协议用户通过internet将一台计算机上的文件传送到另一台计算机上。

hypertext transfer protocol 超文本传输协议 服务程序所用的协议。

html home page marker language 主页标记语言,用于浏览器浏览显示。

hub 网络集线器,提供许多计算机连接的端口。

router 路由器,互联网的标准设备,具有判断网络地址、选择路径、实现网络互联的功能。

gateway 网关。

tcp/ip transfer control protocol/internet protocol 传输控制/互联网协议,是互联网的基本协议。

nds domain name system 域名服务系统。

e-mail electronic mail 电子邮件。

commerce 商业部门的域名

.edu education 教育部门的域名

.net 网络服务部门的域名

.org organization非商业组织的域名

.gov 部门的域名

@ 电子邮件中用户名与域名的分隔符,读音为at。

optics 光的,fiber optics 光纤。

isdn integrated services digital network, 综合服务数字网

ddn defense data service, 数字数据服务。

bandwidth 带宽,网络线路的传输速度。

broad band 宽带(可同时在多个通道容纳数据,音像信号)

hacker 黑客,指专门在互联网上到处从事解密、获取信息等非正规活动的不明身份的用户。

ASIC: Application Specific Integrated Circuit(特殊应用积体电路)

ASC(Auto-Sizing and Centering,自动调效屏幕尺寸和中心位置)

ASC(Anti Static Coatings,防静电涂层)

AS(Anti Glare Anti Static Coatings,防强光、防静电涂层)

BLA: Bearn Landing Area(电子束落区)

BMC(Black Matrix Screen,超黑矩阵屏幕)

CRC: Cyclical Redundancy Check(循环冗余检查)

CRT(Cathode Ray Tube,阴极射线管)

DDC:Display Data Channel,显示数据通道

DEC(Direct Etching Coatings,表面蚀刻涂层)

DFL(Dynamic Focus Lens,动态聚焦)

DFS(Digital Flex Scan,数字伸缩扫描)

DIC: Digital Image Control(数字图像控制)

Digital Multiscan II(数字式智能多频追踪)

DLP(digital Light Processing,数字光处理)

DOSD: Digital On Screen Display(同屏数字化显示)

DPMS(Display Power Management Signalling,显示能源管理信号)

Dot Pitch(点距)

DQL(Dynamic Quadrapole Lens,动态四极镜)

DSP(Digital Signal Processing,数字信号处理)

EFEAL(Extended Field Elliptical Aperture Lens,可扩展扫描椭圆孔镜头)

FRC: Frame Rate Control(帧比率控制)

HVD(High Voltage Differential,高分差动)

LCD(liquid crystal display,液晶显示屏)

LCOS: Liquid Crystal On Silicon(硅上液晶)

LED(light emitting diode,光学二级管)

L-SIC(Low Power-Small Aperture G1 wiht Impregnated Cathode,低电压光圈阴极管)

LVD(Low Voltage Differential,低分差动)

LVDS: Low Voltage Differential Signal(低电压差动信号)

MALS(Multi Astigmatism Lens System,多重散光聚焦系统)

MDA(Monochrome Adapter,单色设备)

MS: Magnetic Sensors(磁场感应器)

Porous Tungsten(活性钨)

RSDS: Reduced Swing Differential Signal(小幅度摆动差动信号)

SC(Screen Coatings,屏幕涂层)

Single Ended(单终结)

Shadow Mask(阴罩式)

TDT(Timeing Detection Table,数据测定表)

TICRG: Tungsten Impregnated Cathode Ray Gun(钨传输阴级射线枪)

TFT(thin film transistor,薄膜晶体管)

UCC(Ultra Clear Coatings,超清晰涂层)

VP: Variable Aperature Grille Pitch(可变间距光栅)

VBI: Vertical Blanking Interval(垂直空白间隙)

VDT(Video Display Terminals,显示终端)

VRR: Vertical Refresh Rate(垂直扫描频率)

与光驱相关的词汇

与光驱相关的词汇

ATAPI(AT Attachment Packet Interface)

BCF(Boot Catalog File,启动目录文件)

BIF(Boot Image File,启动映像文件)

CDR(CD Recordable,可记录光盘)

CD-ROM/XA(CD-ROM eXtended Architecture,唯读光盘增强形架构)

CDRW(CD-Rewritable,可重复刻录光盘)

CLV(Constant Linear Velocity,恒定线速度)

DAE(digital Audio Extraction,数据音频抓取)

DDSS(Double Dynamic Suspension System,双悬浮动态减震系统)

DDSS II(Double Dynamic Suspension System II,第二代双层动力悬吊系统)

PCAV(Part Constant Angular Velocity,部分恒定角速度)

VCD(Video CD,CD)

认识常见计算机语言的缩略表达

认识常见计算机语言的缩略表达

CSS: Cascading Style Sheets,层叠格式表

DCD: Document Content Description for XML: XML文件内容描述

DTD: Document Type Definition,文件类型定义

HTML(HyperText Markup Language,超文本标记语言)

JVM: Ja Virtual Machine, Ja虚拟机

OJI: Open Ja VM Interface,开放JAVA虚拟机接口

SGML: Standard Generalized Markup Language,标准通用标记语言

SMIL: Synchronous Multimedia Integrate Language(同步多媒体集成语言)

VRML:Virtual Reality Makeup Language,虚拟现实结构化语言

VXML(Voice eXtensible Markup Language,语音扩展标记语言)

XML: Extensible Markup Language(可扩展标记语言)

XSL: Extensible Style Sheet Language(可扩展设计语言)

DOS是啥意思?怎么用的?

此题是一个选择问句。

be culture smart or be science intelligent?是要文化所带来的聪慧,还是要科学带来的智能?culture用来强调smart的方式。be smart, be culture smart。同理 ,science是intelligent的方式,be intelligent, be science intelligent.

例文4篇,仅供参考---

1.

Good afternoon,ladies and gentlemen,distinguished guests and honorable judges:

I’m xxxfrom E810. It is my great honour to share my viewpoints on Culture Smart or Science Intelligent with you.

This question resemble Mother or Fanther, who do you like better. Most of us will chose mother, when we were young, we always song Mum Is The Best In The World told us.

Here I wnna make an analogy, Let’s likened Culture Smart to Mother, likened Science Intelligent to father.

Formerly, as is the nature’s call:we like mother for almost five thousand years, she gives us the most long-standing history of civilization in the world. It is no exaggeration to say that the culture of our country is the most brilliant in the world. as it turned out, we he a great distance between our father Science Intelligent.Therefore he give us only the four great inventions of ancient China, which included powder ,compass, papaermaking, and printing,moreover, we didn’t make full use of it,

On the contrary, our brother western countries are fond of father Science Intelligent obviously, Because father gives them many technology which helped them become developed country.

Meanwhile we are always proud of our culture,For example, our abundant cultural deposits which made our civilization like a shining star in the darkness. When people mentioned about the human civilization, we he to refer to our China, because Chinese culture is the most historical and brilliant culture in the world.

But, by the way our technology has get far behind the western countries.

Unfortunately,one day, They attacked us with our own invention powder .our father sent his sons western countries to give us a good beating, because if we fall behind,we will be punished by those who are one-up. we do nothing about it, because what we he is just culture,rather than defence of hign technology.

Evidently ,god is fair, God closed a door and will open another window for you.

Here I wanna share a story that my history teacher told me. Once upon a time, There was a couple, they had two children ,the elder brother liked reading, he could acquire much knowledge from books in his study ,the younger brother was a behiourist, no matter what kinds of problems in front of him, he will take action to solve it, all he believed was that the practice is the sole criterion for testing truth. So he made a plan to trel around the world, Decades years past, they both became adults ,the elder brother had become a teacher at his hometown (at the local) ,He tought Confucian culture for many children. He imparted knowledge and culture to people, However, his younger brother came back home with many manual skills, for example he learned how to make gizmos, such as windmill which helped the local farmers in Irrigating crop fields, and the round wheels which made transportation more convenient and so on.

All right, Let's keep on track. Culture Smart or Science Intelligent like these two brothers, who is better? The answer is both are good, They are as close as two siblings, two brother can never be divided.

2.

Good morning, Ladies and Gentlemen: thanks for raising your attention. It’s a pleasure for me to share my point of view of the topic with you all. Well ,the topic I’m going to deal with is “culture smart or science intelligent”.

When the topic first caught my eye , the great artist Leonardo Da Vinci occurred to me . As is known to all, Leonardo has a gift for the paining, so there are many famous painting works drawn by him which are really impressive ,such as the well-known portrait Mona Lisa, however , he is not only an artist ,but a great inventor and a scientist. Everything he saw , heard , or experienced was an opportunity to learn something new, in another word , everything fascinated him. Therefore , according to his notebook , we found many inventions that were full of imagination and some theories about optics , which did help Leonardo’s paintings to be more vivid. So , I believe that the culture and science can be compatible, rather than an alternative.

As far as I’m concerned , the intelligent one in science may be a clever one , while the smart one in culture might be wisdom. Someone once said , the elimination of culture leads to the disearance of civilization, this proves that we need the guidance of culture smart . On one hand , the culture provides ideological power to science and technology , on the other hand , culture prevents the tendency of extremity of science and technology . Nevertheless, there’s no dou that the science and technology take the supreme lead of the productivity. Without the advanced science and technology , no achievements or progress would be made .What the distinctive feature of science is its commitment to an open-ended exploration. Then , my conclusion is the science and culture are not antagonistic, instead , they’re the complement.

Life is a multiple-choice exam , so I believe the answer is not an only certain thing. I’d like to compare the science to the composition of a painting , while the culture to the color of the painting ; the science is just like the heart , and the culture is our mind. Culture motivate science , and science develop culture.

3.How often he we not been told that the study of physical science is incompetent to confer culture; that it touches none of the higher problems of life; and, what is worse, that the continual devotion to scientific studies tends to generate a narrow and bigoted belief in the licability of scientific methods to the search after truth of all kinds ? How frequently one has reason to observe that no reply to a troublesome argument tells so well as calling its author a "mere scientific specialist." And, as I am afraid it is not permissible to speak of this form of opposition to scientific education in the past tense; may we not expect to be told that this, not only omission, but prohibition, of "mere literary instruction and education" is a patent example of scientific narrow-mindedness?

I think that we must all assent to the first proposition. For culture certainly means something quite different from learning or technical skill. It implies the possession of an ideal, and the habit of critically estimating the value of things by comparison with a theoretic standard. Perfect culture should supply a complete theory of life, based upon a clear knowledge alike of its possibilities and of its limitations.

What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture

What Science Offers the Humanities examines some of the deep problems facing current roaches to the study of culture. It focuses especially on the excesses of postmodernism, but also acknowledges serious problems with postmodernism's harshest critics. In short, in order for the humanities to progress, its scholars need to take seriously contributions from the natural sciences-and particular research on human cognition-which demonstrate that any separation of the mind and the body is entirely untenable. The author provides suggestions for how humanists might begin to utilize these scientific discoveries without conceding that science has the last word on morality, religion, art, and literature. Calling into question such deeply entrenched dogmas as the "blank slate" theory of nature, strong social constructivism, and the ideal of disembodied reason, What Science Offers the Humanities replaces the human-sciences divide with a more integrated roach to the study of culture.

Technology and Culture he both influenced each other equally. Technology has been directed as an improvement in our lives, but on the other hand, Culture has been present in every invention, noticeable or not, and advancement in our evolving society. Technology is becoming focused upon more and more everyday, but culture is the determining factor that decides if there is a necessity for an improvement. There are endless views and perspectives that this situation can be viewed from, but without a dou, Technology and Culture shape one another. Culture has been a part of our society, and way of life, forever. It is almost impossible to come up with an idea that isnt influenced by culture. Picture our lives without cars, television, and computers. This would be an example of everyday life without technology. People could function hily in that type of atmosphere, but technology has changed our lives forever. Technology has changed our pace and perspective on education. Students would he to go to libraries and spend a lot of time researching to find out information for class assignments, but with technology students can find almost anything on there home computers and by accessing the internet. Technology has definitely become the authoritative factor in our lives, but culture has shaped technology. Technology is made and used in such a variety of ways because many people who use the technology of today come from all walks of life and he different necessities, so to compensate for that technology must adapt to all different cultures.

4.

Culture Smart or Science Intelligent

Good evening,ladies and gentlemen,distinguished guests and honorable judges:

It is my great honour to share my viewpoints on Culture Smart and Science Intelligence with all of dear audience present.

As is known to us all that our contemporary lives and the society in current are undergoing profound changes with the promoting development of science and technology. However, he we realized the estrange and departure of our culture against the background on which the positive achievements he been brought by science and technology. Which course should we take in culture smart and science intelligence as the issue on social development is concerned in the process of ultrahigh-speeded urbanization? My viewpoint is clear an firm, that is the cultue smart.

It is generally accepted by the broad mass that science and technology take the supreme lead of the productivity. No achievements nurtured by civilization in our contemporary society can be created without the development of science and technology and the society will fall to its stagnant pace. Thanks to the progress made by the advancing science and technology, especially the development of intelligentization, schemed out by robots, unmanned driving and digital platform, offers great convienience to both the production and daily lives of human beings and promotes the social progress.

But under no circumstances should we admit that a series of problems on environment and social ethics concerning environment pollution, ozonocity, greenhouse effect, colon human and nuclear deterrent occurred against the prosperity carried out by science and technology. So how can we spare no effort on keeping such problems from deterioration in all possibilities? What development pattern will be on science and technology in future?

The answer is that we need the guidance of culture smart. When we talk about culture, we may regard it as the tradition and history, but how can the intelligentization of science and technology be guided by the culture smart? Here I want to put it that culture is not like a pond filled with stagnant water, but a dynamic system. We can never draw a conclusion of culture as “the deposit of history”, what’s more, we should make it clear that the culture defines our present and future. Modernization, of any kind or shape, shares no alteration on its starting point but the commencement of culture. If not the modernization will inevitably fall to the situation where the water has no source and the tree has no root. The development of science and technology takes no exception on this.

The ultrahigh speed of the development of contemporary science and technology contributes no efforts on science and technology itself, but the ideological motivation and the promotion spurred by the ideological power offerd by culture smart. Karl Poopper once said, the elimination of culture leads to the disearance of civilization. It is obviously that if the promotion effect had been omitted, the science and technology could he been far-reached.

The culture smart guides our society into stability and prosperity. We need culture smart because on the one hand, culture provides ideological power to science and technology, on the other hand, culture prevents the tendency of extremity of science and technology. The current problem concerning colon human, outerspace utilitization and nuclear weapon byproducted by contemporary science and technology call for the development in a just course on the sphere of culture. The wisdom-vacanted culture and the extremized science and technology will throw a great threat to the survival of us human beings and the world peace.

So, ladies and gentlemen, I think that the culture wisdom is our “root” and we need the root that supports our belief, the negation of the root casts its reflections on history and the existence of us human beings. So only in the manner of settling on the basis of culture smart can we make it helpful to the development of science and technology in a just course, the continual progress of human society, the prosperity and peace.

Thank you!

Both science itself, and the human culture of which it is a part, would benefit from a story of science that encourages wider engagement with and participation in the processes of scientific exploration. Such a story, based on a close analysis of scientific method, is presented here. It is the story of science as story telling and story revising. The story of science as story suggests that science can and should serve three distinctive functions for humanity: providing stories that may increase (but never guarantee) human well-being, serving as a supportive nexus for human exploration and story telling in general, and exemplifying a commitment to skepticism and a resulting open-ended and continuing exploration of what might yet be. Some practical considerations that would further the development and acceptance of such a story of science as a widely shared nexus of human activity are described.

Culture Smart or Science Intelligent?

Science and Culture

What is science? How does it relate to our lives as individual human beings? to other aspects of our social and cultural communities?

What is our future? ...our own role in and responsibility for the future? Can empirical inquiry help with such questions?

How does empirical understanding relate to other kinds of understanding? Are they necessarily antagonistic or can they usefully complement one another?

Division and specialization of function – science school and culture school

The intention is to retain traditional methods of teaching science, but to adjust the quantity of this kind of rigorous education to the abilities and attitudes of the student. This implies that it would be more educationally efficient for weaker students to spend just one or two hours per day learning science in a rigorous and ‘didactic’ classroom situation than to spend much longer in less-structured forms of classroom experience. At least, it is known from extensive experience (with elite students) that traditional methods are an effective and efficient way of teaching science.

A general understanding of efficiency in systems suggests some principles which would be likely to lead to greater science education efficiency. Perhaps the most frequent way in which human (and biological) systems are able to increase their efficiency is the principle of ‘division of labour’ which was first articulated by the economist Adam Smith. Division of labour increases the complexity of organization by specialization of function, and coordination of these specialized functions. Smith’s famous example involved a pin factory, in which the procedure for making a pin was broken down into numerous simpler, more-specialized sequential steps; and these steps were coordinated by managers leading to vastly increased efficiency (as measured by the numbers of pins produced per person per day) [8].

When the modern school is examined in this light, it can be seen that there is already considerable specialization. For example teachers are specialized according to age of children taught, subject matter expertise, and administrative responsibilities. Schools are also internally specialized by age stratification and academic aptitude of students (also, sometimes, by the or socio-economic class of students). However, logically there is a further possible division of function. My proposal is that the efficiency of science teaching might be increased by introducing a functional division between science education, and what might be termed cultural education - which would include arts, sports, ethics, social aspects of schooling and any other educational objectives such as good citizenship.

Schools might he an internal functional division into ‘science school’ and ‘culture school’. This functional division should be reflected in terms of physical plant, separate administrative structures, and the recruitment of differently-specialized teaching personnel. These divisions would be characterized by the nature of their system-characteristic internal evaluations. For instance, the evaluations within science school would be relatively narrow and more examination-focused than in the culture school. In science school the performance of both teaching staff and students would be judged mainly (although not exclusively) by scientific criteria, including formal examination results. Science school would be distinguished by its academic ethos and scholarly expectations. The focus of science school would be to inculcate the aptitude for abstract systematic cognition.

For example, an existing school might become physically divided between science and cultural parts, each on distinct parts of the campus. Each student would spend some significant part of each day (depending on their aptitude and motivation) in the ‘science school’, experiencing a traditional-style, didactic, disciplined and rigorous academic education which is (so far as we can tell) the best way to teach real science at the basic level. Science school teaching would need to be stratified according to ability and aptitude, since this is more efficient than teaching widely-mixed classes. Different strata of students could be taught from a broadly common curriculum (enabling educational credit accumulation and transfer); but different abilities of student would cover different amounts of subject matter, different specific subjects, and progress at different speeds.

The remainder of the students’ time at school would be spent in the cultural division, which would focus on broader aspects, and aiming to generate a more rounded and social individual. Examinations in culture school would be much more based on participation, sustained effort, attitudes, attendance etc. Inevitably, since it has many aims and a wider focus, culture school would ly many evaluations to its teachers and students. Inevitably, too, these evaluations would be less clear-cut and more contested.

海尔格言:日事日毕,日清日高。是什么意思

DOS是Disk Operation System(磁盘操作系统)的简称。DOS是一个基于磁盘管理的操作系统,是一种命令行形式的,需要输入命令的形式才能把指令传给计算机,让计算机实现操作的。

经常在修理电脑时会需要进入DOS.

扩展资料

1、对于WIN98系统及之前的windows操作系统都是基于DOS基础上开发的,可以进入DOS。方法是:开机按F8 选5就能进,然后打WIN加回车就可以进入系统,或者在系统里[开始]中进入MS-DOS,然后输入EXIT就可以回来。

2、而对于如2000和XP的没有纯DOS,所以常规方法是不允许Windows XP进入DOS状态的,但是Windows XP有一个支持仿DOS命令行的环境——MS-DOS,在其中可以运行大部分的DOS命令,甚至许多DOS下的游戏软件也可以运行。

3、对于那些不能进入DOS的系统,若要进入,可以按下面的方式安装DOS:

a、 有的系统盘光盘上的工具里面带有DOS程序,可以通过系统光盘进入系统了。

b、如果没有光盘或者光盘上没有DOS的话。可以下一个DOS系统,然后安装好,重启系统。在启动时电脑会让选择启动的系统,选择DOS就行了。

参考资料:

format(DOS命令)_百度百科

篮球场上各个位置的英文缩写是什么?

意思:

日事日毕指今天的工作必须今天完成,日清日高指今天要完成的事情相比昨天必须要有质的提高,而明天要达成的目标必须比今天更高。

日事日毕,日清日高。这句话,是海尔公司最早提出的的管理口号。

扩展资料:

海尔将“日事日毕、日清日高”管理模式具体应用,创出“三个管理原则”、“九个控制要素”。

所谓三个管理原则,是“闭环原则”: 凡事要善始善终,有P、D、C 、A plan()、do(实施)、check(检查)、action(循环原则,螺旋上升)。

海尔的管理经验:“斜坡小球原理”——海尔发展的动力与源泉。“OEC管理方法”即日事日毕,日清日高。海尔的管理创新---以市场链为基础的业务流程再造:

1、以SST为手段

2、以流程再造为中心

3、以订单为驱动力

4、以企业文化和OEC管理为平台

5、以追求顾客满意度最大化为目标

6、价值分配市场化。负债经营及三化原则:商流、物流、资金流、信息流的整合。创新为准6S现场管理办法,实施6σ,追求完美。

参考资料:

百度百科-日清日高

篮球场上各个位置的英文缩写都是什么的回答如下:

1、答案:Point Guard(控球后卫),简称PG。 Shooting Guard(得分后卫),简称SG。 Small Forward(小前锋),简称。 Power Forward(强力前锋),简称PF。 Center(中锋),简称C。

2、相关内容:传统上,根据球员在球场的前、中、后位置,可以大致分出三个位置,包括前锋、中锋、后卫。现代篮球比赛中,场上的五名球员通常分为五个位置,包括控球后卫(PG)、得分后卫(SG)、中锋(C)、小前锋()、大前锋(PF)五者。在国际篮球规则中,对于球员的角色并没有特别定义,教练也可以视情形随时改变场上球员的角色。在篮球比赛中,每个位置的责任定义也不是绝对的,球员可能同时负担多种功能,因此出现了如控球前锋、中前锋、双能卫等的名称。不同的篮球位置球员有其自己的优势和劣势。

3、英文表示:basketball positions

4、